From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohnfeld v. Tanenbaum

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1906
76 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1906)

Opinion

Argued February 12, 1906

Decided February 27, 1906

Benjamin N. Cardozo and Sol. M. Stroock for appellant.

George W. Weiffenbach for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT and CHASE, JJ. Absent: CULLEN, Ch. J.


Summaries of

Cohnfeld v. Tanenbaum

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1906
76 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1906)
Case details for

Cohnfeld v. Tanenbaum

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES M. COHNFELD, Respondent, v . LEON TANENBAUM, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 27, 1906

Citations

76 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1906)
76 N.E. 1092