From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohn v. Helfant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1910
140 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Opinion

October, 1910.


Judgment of the Municipal Court in so far as appealed from reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that it does not appear that Horowitz and Rashkin were partners of Helfant at the time of the conversion. Woodward, Jenks, Thomas and Carr, JJ., concurred; Rich J., dissented.


Summaries of

Cohn v. Helfant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1910
140 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for

Cohn v. Helfant

Case Details

Full title:Eser B. Cohn, Respondent, v. Joseph Helfant and Max Levine, Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1910

Citations

140 App. Div. 892 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)