From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohn v. City of Stuart

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 26, 1997
702 So. 2d 255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 97-0089

Opinion filed November 26, 1997

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Cynthia G. Angelos, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-26 CA.

Lynn G. Waxman of Lynn G. Waxman, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Robert D. Critton, Jr. of Burman, Critton Luttier, North Palm Beach, for appellants.

Rhea P. Grossman of Rhea P. Grossman, P.A., Miami, for appellee.


In entering summary judgment in favor of the appellee, the trial court found that the district court's resolution of the legal issues in favor of the appellee during a prior federal suit between the parties collaterally estopped the appellants from asserting their state law claims. However, the district court's judgment, which is currently pending and subject to de novo review in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal, see Gold v. City of Miami, 121 F.3d 1442, 1445 n. 3 (11th Cir. 1997), was not final and therefore did not have preclusive effect upon the appellants' state action. See Reese v. Damato, 44 Fla. 692, 33 So. 462, 464 (1902). We therefore reverse and remand this cause to the trial court to stay the proceedings, pending the outcome of the appeal in the federal system. See City of Miami v. Fraternal Order of Police, Miami Lodge No. 20, 414 So.2d 225, 226 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

DELL, WARNER and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cohn v. City of Stuart

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 26, 1997
702 So. 2d 255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Cohn v. City of Stuart

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM COHN, AND LILLIAN COHN, APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF STUART, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 26, 1997

Citations

702 So. 2d 255 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)