From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 5, 1914
162 App. Div. 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

June 5, 1914.

George J. McDonnell, for the appellant.

Wales F. Severance, for the respondent.


This action was tried with that of Aida Cohn, who was plaintiff's wife.

For the reason stated in the case of said Aida Cohn against the same defendant, this judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

INGRAHAM, P.J., CLARKE and HOTCHKISS, JJ., concurred; McLAUGHLIN, J., dissented.


This action was brought to recover damages for loss of services of plaintiff's wife. It was tried with her action to recover damages for her injuries. Plaintiff had a recovery of $1,000.

For the reason stated by me in the opinion in Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Co. ( 162 App. Div. 791), decided herewith, I think this judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial granted.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 5, 1914
162 App. Div. 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOAN COHN, Respondent, v . ANSONIA REALTY COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1914

Citations

162 App. Div. 794 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
148 N.Y.S. 41

Citing Cases

Sprague v. Webb

"The fact that the illegality of the contract was neither pleaded nor urged at the trial is of no moment, for…