From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohen v. Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1974
44 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

April 22, 1974


In consolidated negligence actions to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 11, 1973, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original decision denying his prior motion to restore the case to the Trial Calendar, the case having previously been dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs, and prior motion granted, upon condition that, within 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon, plaintiff's attorney personally pay $250 costs, half to each of the two sets of defendants who appeared separately and filed separate briefs on this appeal. In our opinion it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny plaintiff's motion to vacate the dismissal of the action and restore the case to the Trial Calendar. The facts adduced warranted the granting of the motion upon the payment of costs as herein directed ( Moran v. Rynar, 39 A.D.2d 718; Barrada v. Target Constr. Corp., 31 A.D.2d 810). Martuscello, Acting P.J., Latham, Shapiro, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cohen v. Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 22, 1974
44 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Cohen v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:SOL COHEN, Appellant, v. NATHAN TUCKER et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1974

Citations

44 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

Schickler v. Seifert

In reversing our prior decision, upon this reargument we determine that the blame for the delay and expense…

Ostergard v. Carminati

cision upon inquest finding him liable for negligence. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs…