From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohen v. Suleminian

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 24, 2024
2:21-cv-08597-SSS-ASx (C.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2024)

Opinion

2:21-cv-08597-SSS-ASx

07-24-2024

Ronen Cohen, et al. v. Shirely Suleminian, et al.


Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES- GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COUNTERCLAIMS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

On July 22, 2024, the Court dismissed Plaintiff SKU Diamond Jewelry, LLC's sixth amended complaint (“SAC”). [Dkt. 141]. In light of this, all that remains before the Court is Defendants' counterclaims against Ronen Cohen and Orit Cohen. [Dkt. 12]. However, as of the SAC, the only Plaintiff in this matter is the entity SKU Diamond Jewelry, LLC. [Dkt. 129 at 2 n.1]. As such, the Court hereby ORDERS Defendants to show cause as to why the counterclaims should not be dismissed as moot.

Defendants SHALL file their response to this OSC by August 2, 2024.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cohen v. Suleminian

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 24, 2024
2:21-cv-08597-SSS-ASx (C.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Cohen v. Suleminian

Case Details

Full title:Ronen Cohen, et al. v. Shirely Suleminian, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 24, 2024

Citations

2:21-cv-08597-SSS-ASx (C.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2024)

Citing Cases

Ruiz v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am.

Plaintiff's bare allegation that an assignment was made is insufficient to establish a valid assignment. See…