From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohen v. Paprocki

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 9, 1936
158 Misc. 465 (N.Y. App. Term 1936)

Opinion

January 9, 1936.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Patent, Stern Rachstein, for the appellant.

Sol H. Glaubman, for the respondents.


The procedure for obtaining a bill of particulars in an action in the Municipal Court of the City of New York is provided for in subdivision 7 of section 78 of the Municipal Court Code. The board of justices of the Municipal Court was, therefore, without authority to adopt rule 17 of the Central Motion Part Rules, because such rule contravenes subdivision 7 of section 78 of the Municipal Court Code and attempts to regulate a matter of procedure specifically provided for by law.

Order denying plaintiff's application to vacate the order reversed and order vacated and set aside, with ten dollars costs to the appellant.

All concur. Present — LYDON, HAMMER and FRANKENTHALER, JJ.


Summaries of

Cohen v. Paprocki

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 9, 1936
158 Misc. 465 (N.Y. App. Term 1936)
Case details for

Cohen v. Paprocki

Case Details

Full title:BEATRICE COHEN, Appellant, v. STEVEN PAPROCKI and Others, Respondents

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 1936

Citations

158 Misc. 465 (N.Y. App. Term 1936)
286 N.Y.S. 26

Citing Cases

Cohen v. Smith

" (Italics mine.) ( Cohen v. Paprocki, 158 Misc. 465 [App. Term, First Dept.]; Teitelbaum v. Empire Bottling…