December, 1926.
Order denying motion to dismiss complaint for lack of prosecution reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Plaintiff's excuse for not bringing the case to trial was entirely insufficient. Kelly, P.J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur.
Full title:SAMUEL COHEN, Respondent, v. CHARLES H. MEYER, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Dec 1, 1926
The defendant's motion should have been granted; the sequestration order should have been vacated and…
Lorenzen v. CavanaughOrder denying motion to dismiss complaint for lack of prosecution reversed upon the law and the facts, with…