From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohen v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 16, 1997
242 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 16, 1997

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Schackman, J.).


We agree with the trial court that the only distributable assets of this law partnership of any value were its contingency fee files, which were distributed to the parties in accordance with their partnership agreement through self-help methods. Plaintiff's claims that defendant breached the partnership agreement by taking files without first obtaining client consents and that he is entitled to a share of any proceeds realized on the files that were distributed to defendant are defeated by his admissions that he retained for his own benefit partnership money and the fees he collected on the files that were distributed to him. Plaintiff's actions in this regard involved assets that, under his view, belonged to both parties, and, as such, were a breach of his own fiduciary duties to defendant. Accordingly, the doctrine of unclean hands applies to bar any right plaintiff might otherwise have had to an accounting ( cf., Mehlman v. Avrech, 146 A.D.2d 753, 754).

We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Williams, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.


Summaries of

Cohen v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 16, 1997
242 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Cohen v. Katz

Case Details

Full title:RALPH COHEN, Appellant, v. RICHARD J. KATZ et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 16, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 448 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 40

Citing Cases

O'Flaherty v. Belgum

shed partnership business was not barred by their bad faith acts and the court declined to decide "what…

State v. JEDA Capital-Lenox, LLC

In its bill of particulars, JEDA states that "DOT wrongfully invoiced JEDA, never submitted any backup…