From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohen v. Humana Medical Plans, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 22, 2006
922 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 4D06-619.

March 22, 2006.

Petition for writ of mandamus to the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. CL 99-1249AA.

Brian R. Hersh of Law Offices of Brian R. Hersh, Miami, and Alvin Weinstein of Law Offices of Alvin Weinstein, Miami, for petitioners.

No response required for respondents.


The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Cohen v. Freeman, 914 So.2d 449 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), does not preclude the trial court from conducting an evidentiary hearing on the nature and extent of the settlement agreement and its terms. The opinion rejects Dr. Freeman's claim that he had the right to control the malpractice litigation.

SHAHOOD, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cohen v. Humana Medical Plans, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 22, 2006
922 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Cohen v. Humana Medical Plans, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Blossom COHEN and Abraham Cohen, her husband, Petitioners, v. HUMANA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 22, 2006

Citations

922 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Freeman v. Medical Protective Co. of Fort Wayne, Ind.

The patient also filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Fourth District Court of Appeal to enforce…

Freeman v. Cohen

The opinion rejects Dr. Freeman's claim that he had the right to control the malpractice litigation.Cohen v.…