From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohen v. Hanratty

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 10, 2015
No. 66409 (Nev. Sep. 10, 2015)

Opinion

No. 66409

09-10-2015

DIANE COHEN, Appellant, v. KARI J. HANRATTY, ESQ., Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to NRCP 60(b). Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; William S. Potter, Judge.

We previously entered an order granting appellant's counsel's motion to withdraw and directing appellant to either retain new counsel and cause new counsel to file a notice of appearance in this court, or inform this court, in writing, that she does not intend to retain new counsel and will be proceeding in pro se. We cautioned appellant that failure to comply with our order could result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. To date, no counsel has filed a notice of appearance on appellant's behalf and appellant has not otherwise responded to our order. Accordingly, we presume that appellant has abandoned this appeal and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED

/s/_________, J.

Parraguirre
/s/_________, J.
Douglas
/s/_________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. William S. Potter, District Judge, Family Court Division

James J. Jimmerson, Settlement Judge

Hanratty Law Group

Eighth District Court Clerk

Diane Cohen


Summaries of

Cohen v. Hanratty

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Sep 10, 2015
No. 66409 (Nev. Sep. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Cohen v. Hanratty

Case Details

Full title:DIANE COHEN, Appellant, v. KARI J. HANRATTY, ESQ., Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 10, 2015

Citations

No. 66409 (Nev. Sep. 10, 2015)