From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohen v. Friedland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

November, 1931.



Order, in so far as it dismisses the complaint and directs judgment, and judgment entered thereon, reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and judgment vacated. In so far as it grants the motion to strike out the causes of action contained in the complaint, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiff to plead over within twenty days from the entry of the order herein. In our opinion, upon the facts set forth in the six so-called causes of action, the plaintiff has one cause of action, to wit, a stockholder's derivative action, but he must first establish at the trial that he was defrauded of his 150 shares of stock. Appeal from order denying motion to resettle order dismissed. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cohen v. Friedland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Cohen v. Friedland

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN COHEN, Suing on Behalf of Himself and Other Stockholders of RUGBY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1931

Citations

234 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)