From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohen v. Dana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 1948
273 App. Div. 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

May 17, 1948.


In a stockholders' action, order denying appellants' motion for leave to amend their answers to add an affirmative defense thereto, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. It not appearing that the defense was palpably insufficient, its validity should not have been determined on a motion to serve an amended pleading. ( Newman v. Goldberg, 250 App. Div. 431; Coron v. Lincks, 259 App. Div. 924; Gillette v. Allen, 269 App. Div. 441, 449.) Lewis, P.J., Carswell, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cohen v. Dana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 17, 1948
273 App. Div. 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Cohen v. Dana

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN W. COHEN et al., Suing on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 17, 1948

Citations

273 App. Div. 1017 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Whitestone Realty Corp. v. Malba Properties

In our opinion, appellant's attempt at amendment, designed merely to change the alleged valuations of the…

Station Assoc. v. Long Island R.R. Co.

Having failed to do so, it was necessary that the instant application be made and it was made on January 29,…