From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohen v. Cohen

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 16, 2015
134 A.D.3d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2013-08741 Index No. 202619/11.

12-16-2015

Ilan COHEN, appellant, v. Tamara COHEN, respondent.

Jeffrey S. Schecter & Associates, P.C., Garden City, N.Y., for appellant. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP, Lake Success, N.Y. (Michael E. Ratner of counsel), for respondent.


Jeffrey S. Schecter & Associates, P.C., Garden City, N.Y., for appellant.

Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara & Wolf, LLP, Lake Success, N.Y. (Michael E. Ratner of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jeffrey A. Goodstein, J.), dated July 15, 2013. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the defendant's motion for an award of an interim attorney's fee.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendant's motion for an award of an interim attorney's fee (see Domestic Relations Law § 237[a]; DeCabrera v. Cabrera–Rosete, 70 N.Y.2d 879, 524 N.Y.S.2d 176, 518 N.E.2d 1168; Prichep v. Prichep, 52 A.D.3d 61, 858 N.Y.S.2d 667; cf. Abramson v. Gavares, 109 A.D.3d 849, 851, 971 N.Y.S.2d 538).

The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit.

DILLON, J.P., HALL, COHEN and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cohen v. Cohen

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 16, 2015
134 A.D.3d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Cohen v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:Ilan COHEN, appellant, v. Tamara COHEN, respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 16, 2015

Citations

134 A.D.3d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 9244
20 N.Y.S.3d 896

Citing Cases

Cohen v. Cohen

The court noted that in opposition to the defendant's cross motion, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant…