sanctioning attorney for violating confidentiality provisions of court-annexed mediation program
Summary of this case from Fields-D'Arpino v. Restaurant AssociatesEditorial Note:
This opinion is published in the advance sheet at this citation Cohen v. Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield, 178 F.R.D. 385, was withdrawn from the bound volume because the decision and underlying papers were ordered to be sealed.
sanctioning attorney for violating confidentiality provisions of court-annexed mediation program
Summary of this case from Fields-D'Arpino v. Restaurant Associatessanctioning attorney for violating confidentiality provisions of court-annexed mediation program
Summary of this case from Folb v. Motion Picture Industry Pension & Health PlansFull title:COHEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. EMPIRE BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD…
Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York.
Date published: Mar 10, 1998
Other New York district courts have impliedly approved a federal mediation privilege by sanctioning attorneys…
Fields-D'Arpino v. Restaurant AssociatesIn this regard, courts have implicitly recognized that maintaining expectations of confidentiality is…