From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohea v. Pliler

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 24, 2008
286 F. App'x 436 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-15859.

Submitted July 14, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed July 24, 2008.

Danny J. Cohea, pro se.

Grant Lien, Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Frank C. Damrell, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 2:00-CV-02799-FCD.

Before: SCHROEDER, LEAVY and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Upon review of the record and appellant's opening brief, this court hereby summarily affirms the district court's order denying appellant's motions for preliminary injunctive relief. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (summary affirmance appropriate where result is clear from face of record).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Cohea v. Pliler

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 24, 2008
286 F. App'x 436 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Cohea v. Pliler

Case Details

Full title:Danny J. COHEA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cheryl K. PLILER; et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 24, 2008

Citations

286 F. App'x 436 (9th Cir. 2008)