From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohea v. Pliler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2006
No. CIV S-00-2799 FCD PAN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-00-2799 FCD PAN P.

August 28, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's August 21, 2006 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Cohea v. Pliler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 28, 2006
No. CIV S-00-2799 FCD PAN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Cohea v. Pliler

Case Details

Full title:DANNY JAMES COHEA, Plaintiff, v. CHERYL K. PLILER, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 28, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-00-2799 FCD PAN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2006)