From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cohea v. Adcock

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 17, 2010
No. CIV 09-998 JAM KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV 09-998 JAM KJM P.

December 17, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prison inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 29, 2009, this court granted plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is directed to show cause within twenty one days of the date of this order why his in forma pauperis status should not be revoked as the result of the "strikes" plaintiff suffered before the filing of this complaint: Cohea v. Kirshner, Civ. No. S-94-2105 GEB JFM P; Cohea v. Jones, Civ. No. F-95-5384 REC DLB P; and Cohea v. Bray, 97-366 FCD DAD P. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Cohea v. California, 541 U.S. 970 (2004). Plaintiff's response to this order is limited to twenty pages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 15, 2010.


Summaries of

Cohea v. Adcock

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 17, 2010
No. CIV 09-998 JAM KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Cohea v. Adcock

Case Details

Full title:DANNY JAMES COHEA, Plaintiff, v. S. ADCOCK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 17, 2010

Citations

No. CIV 09-998 JAM KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2010)