From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cogan v. Saleeby

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 29, 1984
454 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 84-1349.

August 29, 1984.

Petition for review from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Lewis Kapner, J.

Wayne Carson of Bernstein, Bernstein Stein, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioners.

Michael B. Davis of Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder Carson, West Palm Beach, for respondents.


Petitioners seek review by common law certiorari of an order of the circuit court granting respondents' motion to sever.

Respondents filed suit to recover compensation for legal services rendered to petitioners. Petitioners answered by filing affirmative defenses and a counterclaim in which they alleged "that the work and/or services supplied by [respondents] were deficient and lacking in professional competence so as to constitute a failure of consideration, negligence and professional malpractice." Respondents moved to sever the counterclaim from the main action. Respondents asserted that the State of Florida had entered an order of liquidation which barred the prosecution of suits against the insureds of Lawyers Professional Liability Insurance Company for a period of six months. The trial court granted respondents' motion to sever.

Respondents did not introduce any evidence in support of this assertion. We direct the trial court's attention to Chrysler Corp. v. Miller, 450 So.2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Leon Shaffer Golnick Advertising, Inc. v. Cedar, 423 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

Petitioners argue that the trial court abused its discretion because the severance may result in inconsistent verdicts. Although petitioners' concern may be well founded, certiorari jurisdiction of this court does not lie because petitioners have failed to demonstrate a material injury which cannot be remedied by plenary appeal. See United States Fidelity Guaranty v. Graham, 404 So.2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), review denied, review dismissed, 419 So.2d 1195, 1201 (Fla. 1982); Chalfonte Development Corp. v. Beaudoin, 370 So.2d 58 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Santini Brothers, Inc. v. Grover, 338 So.2d 79 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

Accordingly, the petition for common law certiorari is denied.

CERTIORARI DENIED.

HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cogan v. Saleeby

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 29, 1984
454 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Cogan v. Saleeby

Case Details

Full title:OSCAR COGAN AND COGAN AND SANDLER, M.D. P.A., PETITIONERS, v. RICHARD E…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 29, 1984

Citations

454 So. 2d 786 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Hickey v. Pompano K of C, Inc.

2d DCA 1991). Although there is dicta in Cogan v. Saleeby, 454 So.2d 786 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) to the effect…