From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cofield v. Motor Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Aug 1, 1911
89 S.C. 419 (S.C. 1911)

Opinion

7994

August 1, 1911.

Before MEMMINGER, J., Richland. Affirmed.

Action by James Cofield against E.A. Jenkins Motor Company. Defendant appeals.

Mr. Robert Moorman, for appellant.

Messrs. Nelson, Nelson Gettys, contra.


August 1, 1911. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


For valuable consideration, defendant gave plaintiff the exclusive agency to sell its motor cars in a certain territory for a specified time, and agreed to allow him a discount of ten per cent. from the catalogue prices on all cars sold. During the life of the contract, defendant, knowing that it was acting in violation of its terms, sold four cars in plaintiff's territory worth, at catalogue prices, $5,300.00. Held, in an action for breach of the contract, that the measure of plaintiff's damages was ten per cent. of the catalogue prices of the cars so sold by defendant.

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE WOODS did not sit in this case.


Summaries of

Cofield v. Motor Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Aug 1, 1911
89 S.C. 419 (S.C. 1911)
Case details for

Cofield v. Motor Co.

Case Details

Full title:COFIELD v. E.A. JENKINS MOTOR CO

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Aug 1, 1911

Citations

89 S.C. 419 (S.C. 1911)
71 S.E. 969

Citing Cases

Hutson v. Stone

Mr. John F. Williams, for appellant, cites: When broker isentitled to commissions on sale of real estate: 80…

Ray v. Railway Company

Action by S.S. Ray against Southern Ry. Co. in court of magistrate S.G. Ray. Defendant appeals. Messrs. B.L.…