From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cofield v. Head

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Jan 31, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-101 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jan. 31, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-101 (MTT).

January 31, 2011


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation to Grant (Doc. 25) (the "Recommendation") of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. The Magistrate Judge, having reviewed the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 18) (the "Motion"), recommends dismissing the claims against the Defendants because the Plaintiff failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997(e)(a). The Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. The Motion is GRANTED. SO ORDERED, this the 31st day of January, 2011.


Summaries of

Cofield v. Head

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Jan 31, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-101 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jan. 31, 2011)
Case details for

Cofield v. Head

Case Details

Full title:Arthur COFIELD, Plaintiff, v. Fred HEAD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division

Date published: Jan 31, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-101 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Jan. 31, 2011)