From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cofield v. Buchanan

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Apr 23, 2008
2008 Ohio 1931 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 90957.

RELEASE DATE: April 23, 2008.

WRIT OF PROCEDENDO, MOTION NO. 406413, ORDER NO. 407355.

COMPLAINT DISMISSED.

Timothy Casey, Attorney at Law, Carol Rubin, Legal Intern, Kelly Sheahen, Legal Intern, Milton A. Kramer Law Clinic Center, ATTORNEY FOR RELATOR.

John H. Gibbon, Director of Law, Laure A. Wagner, First Assistant Director of Law, ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT.


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION


{¶ 1} Relator requests that this court compel respondent judge to issue a ruling with respect to the motion to suppress and motion to dismiss filed by relator in Cleveland Hts. v. Cofield, Cleveland Heights Municipal Court Case No. TRD 0411155.

{¶ 2} Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss attached to which is a copy of the journal entry received for filing by the clerk on February 21, 2008, granting motions to dismiss filed by both relator and the prosecutor. Relator has not opposed the motion. Respondent argues that this action in procedendo is, therefore, moot. We agree.

{¶ 3} Accordingly, respondent's motion to dismiss is granted. Respondent to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).

Complaint dismissed.

CHRISTINE T. MCMONAGLE, J., and FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Cofield v. Buchanan

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Apr 23, 2008
2008 Ohio 1931 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Cofield v. Buchanan

Case Details

Full title:Derek Cofield, Relator, v. Judge A. Deane Buchanan, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County

Date published: Apr 23, 2008

Citations

2008 Ohio 1931 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)