From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cofield v. Bowser

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 18, 2008
294 F. App'x 49 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6121

Submitted: September 10, 2008.

Decided: September 18, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (2:06-cv-00533-WDK-TEM).

Michael Cofield, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Lawrence Dumville, Norris, St. Clair Lotkin, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Michael Cofield appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cofield v. Bowser, No. 2:06-cv-00533-WDK-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 3, 2007 entered Dec. 4, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Cofield v. Bowser

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 18, 2008
294 F. App'x 49 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Cofield v. Bowser

Case Details

Full title:Michael COFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roy BOWSER; Sergeant Stokes…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 18, 2008

Citations

294 F. App'x 49 (4th Cir. 2008)