From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coffman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District,<strong>Division Three</strong>.
Oct 6, 2015
471 S.W.3d 403 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 101802

10-06-2015

Michael Coffman, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Mary H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.


Andrew E. Zleit, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Mary H. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Lawrence E. Mooney, J., and James M. Dowd, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael Coffman appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).


Summaries of

Coffman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District,<strong>Division Three</strong>.
Oct 6, 2015
471 S.W.3d 403 (E.D. Mo. 2015)
Case details for

Coffman v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael Coffman, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District,Division Three.

Date published: Oct 6, 2015

Citations

471 S.W.3d 403 (E.D. Mo. 2015)