Coffey v. Superior Court

Full title: TARIQ COFFEY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY…

Court: California Court of Appeals, First District, Fifth Division

Date published: Jun 16, 2005

No. A108693 (Cal. Ct. App. Jun. 16, 2005)

Opinion

TARIQ COFFEY, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY, Respondent THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. A108693 California Court of Appeal, First District, Fifth Division June 16, 2005

San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. 187421

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING, NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

JONES, P.J.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed on May 24, 2005, be modified as follows:

1. On page 8, the second sentence of the second full paragraph, the words “for a special need� are deleted. The new sentence reads: “The seizure is lawful if authorized under a valid statute.� 2. On page 16, the following sentence is added to the disposition section of the opinion, immediately before the sentence “The petition for writ of mandate is denied.� The sentence to be inserted reads: “The order to show cause, having served its purpose, is discharged.�

There is no change in the judgment.

The petition for rehearing filed by the Real Party in Interest is denied.