From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coffee v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 7, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-1838 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-1838 MCE KJN P.

February 7, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On December 8, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 8, 2010, are adopted in full;
2. This action is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and
3. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 4, 2011


Summaries of

Coffee v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 7, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-1838 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Coffee v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:M.L. COFFEE, Plaintiff, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 7, 2011

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-1838 MCE KJN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)