From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coeur v. Rose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Oct 18, 2016
Case No. 2:16-cv-000117-JNP-DBP (D. Utah Oct. 18, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-cv-000117-JNP-DBP

10-18-2016

Francois Coeur, Plaintiff, v. Allison Rose, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Francois Coeur filed a one-page complaint. (Docket 3). Magistrate Judge Pead dismissed the complaint without prejudice because it failed to meet the basic pleading requirements of rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docket 56). Judge Pead gave Mr. Coeur 15 days to amend the complaint, but Mr. Coeur never did. Judge Pead subsequently recommended that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (Docket 59). Although Mr. Coeur has lodged multiple documents titled "Minute Entries" with the court, he has not filed an objection to Judge Pead's Report and Recommendation.

Based on the court's de novo review of the record, the relevant legal authorities, and Judge Pead's Report and Recommendation, the court concludes that the Report and Recommendation, which incorporated the reasoning of Judge Pead's prior order dismissing the complaint, is a correct application of the law and the facts. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows:

1. The Recommendation (Docket 59) is ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. Mr. Coeur's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED October 18, 2016.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

JILL N. PARRISH

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Coeur v. Rose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Oct 18, 2016
Case No. 2:16-cv-000117-JNP-DBP (D. Utah Oct. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Coeur v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:Francois Coeur, Plaintiff, v. Allison Rose, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Date published: Oct 18, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:16-cv-000117-JNP-DBP (D. Utah Oct. 18, 2016)