From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coe v. Coe

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 422 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided February 1st, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, whose opinion is reported in 97 N.J. Eq. 57.

Mr Howard S. Dodd, for the respondent.

Mr. William Ripley Cobb, for the appellant.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Coe v. Coe

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 422 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Coe v. Coe

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET W. COE, respondent, v. BENJAMIN J. COE, appellant

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 422 (N.J. 1926)

Citing Cases

Martinique v. Martinique

It is plain that the corroborative testimony need not go to each act of extreme cruelty testified to by…

Chamberlain v. Chamberlain

Such abuse culminated in the last act of cruelty on June 16th, 1932, when her husband physically injured her…