From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cody v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 20, 1996
678 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 95-1263.

August 20, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, Frank Bell, J.

Ronald W. Johnson of Kinsey, Troxel, Johnson Walborsky, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; David A. David, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


We affirm the three issues raised by appellant in this appeal. We write only to address the fact that in the instant case appellant raised as his third issue the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Although the general rule is that such claims are barred on direct appeal, an exception "arises when the record below is sufficient to allow determination of an effectiveness claim." Loren v. State, 601 So.2d 271, 272-273 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). In the instant case, the trial court was presented with the ineffectiveness claims in motions for new trial and rehearing, and the court conducted two evidentiary hearings on these claims. This court, therefore, was provided with an ample record regarding the issue, and the trial court's denial of relief is affirmed without further discussion. Because the issue was properly brought on direct appeal, appellant is procedurally barred from raising this issue by post conviction proceedings. Id. at 273.

MINER and LAWRENCE, JJ., and SHIVERS, Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Cody v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 20, 1996
678 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Cody v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAUL CHRISTOPHER CODY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 20, 1996

Citations

678 So. 2d 9 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Booth v. State

We affirm the judgment and sentence entered, without prejudice to appellant's right to raise in the future…

Benton v. State

Generally, such claims must be raised in collateral proceedings, and are not cognizable on direct appeal. See…