From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cockrell v. Kiesling

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Apr 21, 2010
No. 08-10-00005-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 21, 2010)

Opinion

No. 08-10-00005-CV

April 21, 2010.

Appeal from the 356th District Court of Hardin County, Texas, (TC# 47,498).

Before CHEW, C.J., McCLURE, and RIVERA, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This appeal is before the Court on our own motion for determination of whether it should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant, Maris Cockrell, filed a notice of appeal on December 2, 2009. Appellant did not tender the filing fee. By letter dated January 12, 2010, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the filing fee had not been paid and warned that failure to tender such payment within twenty days may result in dismissal. No response was received. Another letter was sent by the Clerk of this Court on March 19, 2010, reminding Appellant that the filing fee had not been paid, and also notifying Appellant that the clerk's record was past due and that the Court had received notice from the District Clerk that financial arrangements for the appellate record had not been made. Again, Appellant was notified of our intent to dismiss the case for want of prosecution unless, within ten days of the notice, Appellant demonstrated grounds for continuing the appeal. Appellant has not responded to the notice. Accordingly, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.


Summaries of

Cockrell v. Kiesling

Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso
Apr 21, 2010
No. 08-10-00005-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Cockrell v. Kiesling

Case Details

Full title:MARIS COCKRELL, Appellant, v. KAREN KIESLING and KANDICE LYONS, Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, El Paso

Date published: Apr 21, 2010

Citations

No. 08-10-00005-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 21, 2010)