From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cockerham v. Vannoy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 24, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 15-630-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Feb. 24, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 15-630-JWD-EWD

02-24-2016

RAYMOND J. COCKERHAM, JR. (#364734) v. WARDEN DARREL VANNOY, ET AL.


AMENDED OPINION

After independently reviewing the entire record in this case including Plaintiff's objection (Doc. 8), and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report issued November 13, 2015 to which an objection was filed and considered:

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e (a), but with prejudice to re-filing the same claim or claims in forma pauperis.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on February 24, 2016.

/s/ _________

JUDGE JOHN W. deGRAVELLES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Underwood v. Wilson, 151 F.3d 292, 296 (5th Cir. 1998).


Summaries of

Cockerham v. Vannoy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Feb 24, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 15-630-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Feb. 24, 2016)
Case details for

Cockerham v. Vannoy

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND J. COCKERHAM, JR. (#364734) v. WARDEN DARREL VANNOY, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Feb 24, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 15-630-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Feb. 24, 2016)