From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cockayne v. Healey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1919
189 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Opinion

October, 1919.


The plaintiff apparently relies upon two causes of action but fails to separately state and number them. He should be required to serve an amended complaint either separately stating and numbering the alleged causes of action or eliminating the cause of action upon which he does not place reliance. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted as above indicated, with ten dollars costs. Clarke, P.J., Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, to the extent indicated in opinion.


Summaries of

Cockayne v. Healey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1919
189 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)
Case details for

Cockayne v. Healey

Case Details

Full title:EDMUND COCKAYNE, an Infant, by ALBERT COCKAYNE, His Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1919

Citations

189 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)