From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cochran v. Wardian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 6, 2012
No. CV 11-2538-PHX-RCB(JFM) (D. Ariz. Feb. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV 11-2538-PHX-RCB(JFM)

02-06-2012

Howard Cochran, Plaintiff, v. Mark Wardian, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff Howard Cochran filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In an Order filed on February 1, 2012, the Court dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim with leave to file a First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 6.) Shortly before that Order was filed, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend the Complaint. (Doc. 5.) Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the Complaint will be denied as moot because he was granted leave to file an amended complaint in the February 1, 2012 Order.

Warnings

A. Release

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release. Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action.

B. Address Changes

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action.

C. Copies

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice to Plaintiff.

D. Possible "Strike"

Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in the February 1, 2012 Order, the dismissal may count as a "strike" under the "3-strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 "if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

E. Possible Dismissal

If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of the February 1, 2012 Order, and these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the Court).

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the Complaint is denied as moot. (Doc. 5.)

____________

Robert . Broomfield

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cochran v. Wardian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 6, 2012
No. CV 11-2538-PHX-RCB(JFM) (D. Ariz. Feb. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Cochran v. Wardian

Case Details

Full title:Howard Cochran, Plaintiff, v. Mark Wardian, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Feb 6, 2012

Citations

No. CV 11-2538-PHX-RCB(JFM) (D. Ariz. Feb. 6, 2012)