From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cochran v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

May, 1936.

Present — Sears, P.J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ. [ 156 Misc. 750.]


Judgment affirmed, with costs. (See Presbyterian Church of Albany v. Cooper, 112 N.Y. 517; Baird v. Baird, 145 id. 659; Hocking Valley R. Co. v. Barbour, 192 App. Div. 654; Strobe v. Netherland Co., 245 id. 573.) All concur, except Sears, P.J., and Thompson, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the authority of Fuller v. Artman (69 Hun, 546). (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action by assignee of an option to compel sale of oil property.)


Summaries of

Cochran v. Taylor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Cochran v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:JOHN K. COCHRAN, Appellant, v. MABEL N. TAYLOR, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)