From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cochran v. Mount Vernon Trust Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1935
245 App. Div. 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

June, 1935.


While we are of the opinion that the first, second and fourth causes of action are insufficient, as defendant moved by a general notice of motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety, the sufficiency of the third cause of action justified the denial of the motion. ( Eidlitz v. Fishbach Moore, Inc., 239 App. Div. 483; White v. Slayback, 190 id. 108.) Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Carswell, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cochran v. Mount Vernon Trust Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1935
245 App. Div. 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Cochran v. Mount Vernon Trust Company

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE L. COCHRAN, Respondent, v. THE MOUNT VERNON TRUST COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1935

Citations

245 App. Div. 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Citing Cases

Triangle Publications, Inc. v. Ferrare

plaintiff's stations. It is the opinion of this court that the court below has jurisdiction to enjoin and…

Savage v. Mathieson Alkali Works

To this extent, each alleged cause of action in a complaint supports the others and is in turn supported by…