From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cocco v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 17, 2018
Case No. 1:16-cv-1082 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 17, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 1:16-cv-1082

08-17-2018

CAYMAN C. COCCO Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Black, J.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation for an award of attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"). (Doc. 17). The parties have stipulated and petitioned the Court to enter an order awarding attorney fees in the sum of $2,775.00 under the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The parties have stipulated that this award will satisfy "any and all claims for fees, expenses, and costs that Plaintiff may have under [EAJA], 28 U.S.C. § 2412." (Id. at 1). Further, "[a]ny fees paid belong to Plaintiff and can be offset to satisfy pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes the United States pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010)." (Id.). See also Kerr v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., -- F.3d --, No. 16-6673, 2017 WL 4931926, *6 (6th Cir. June 15, 2017) (although the plaintiff has the right to assign the EAJA fee award to the plaintiff's lawyer, the award itself is payable to the plaintiff and the Commissioner has "discretion either to honor or not to honor the assignment.").

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT:

The parties' joint stipulation for an award of attorney fees and costs (Doc. 19) be GRANTED and plaintiff be awarded a total of $2,775.00 in attorney fees and costs under the EAJA. Date: 8/17/18

/s/_________

Karen L. Litkovitz

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. This period may be extended further by the Court on timely motion for an extension. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring on the record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon, or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party's objections WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).


Summaries of

Cocco v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 17, 2018
Case No. 1:16-cv-1082 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 17, 2018)
Case details for

Cocco v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:CAYMAN C. COCCO Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 17, 2018

Citations

Case No. 1:16-cv-1082 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 17, 2018)