From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coca-Cola Co., Foods Div. v. Hurst

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 8, 1982
418 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AI-370.

September 8, 1982.

Appeal from the Deputy Commissioner.

Jesse F. Sparks, Orlando, for appellant.

Richard A. Sicking of Kaplan, Sicking, Hessen, Sugarman, Rosenthal De Castro, Miami, for appellee.


The employer appeals a workers' compensation order awarding claimant wage loss benefits from October 14, 1980 through October 31, 1981. The employer argues that the deputy commissioner (deputy) erred in awarding wage loss benefits beyond October 31, 1980 because it was not properly advised that the claim was for wage loss benefits through the date of the hearing. We affirm the order as modified.

It is clear from the record that the employer was aware that the hearing was being held as to wage loss benefits from October 14, 1980 through the time of the November 1981 hearing. However, we modify paragraph (a) of the decretal portion of the order awarding claimant wage loss benefits from October 14, 1980 through October 31, 1981, to be subject to the condition that claimant file properly executed wage loss forms for the period awarded, which forms shall set forth any social security benefits or unemployment compensation the employer is entitled to offset. As modified, the order is AFFIRMED.

MILLS and BOOTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Coca-Cola Co., Foods Div. v. Hurst

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 8, 1982
418 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Coca-Cola Co., Foods Div. v. Hurst

Case Details

Full title:THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, FOODS DIVISION, APPELLANT, v. MAGGIE J. HURST…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 8, 1982

Citations

418 So. 2d 1273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)