From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cobo v. Titlemax of Nev.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 19, 2022
2:22-cv-01778-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Dec. 19, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01778-GMN-BNW

12-19-2022

ALISIA COBO, Plaintiff, TITLEMAX OF NEVADA, INC., Defendant.

Michael Kind (NSBN 13903) Attorney for Plaintiff Alisia Cobo Dale Kotchka-Alanes LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP Attorneys for Defendant TitleMax of Nevada, Inc.


Michael Kind (NSBN 13903) Attorney for Plaintiff Alisia Cobo

Dale Kotchka-Alanes LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP Attorneys for Defendant TitleMax of Nevada, Inc.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiff Alisia Cobo (“Plaintiff'”) and Defendant TitleMax of Nevada, Inc. (“TitleMax”), by counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff has filed a Complaint alleging violations the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 . (ECF No. 1.)

2. TitleMax's response to the Complaint is currently due December 19, 2022. However, the parties are currently discussing the merits of the claims and exploring a resolution that could avoid the need for further litigation. Accordingly, 3. Accordingly, Plaintiff and TitleMax agree to extend the time TitleMax has to respond to the Complaint to and including January 16, 2023.

This is TitleMax's second request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint. The first requested extension was granted.

Respectfully submitted

KIND LAW

LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE LLP

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cobo v. Titlemax of Nev.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 19, 2022
2:22-cv-01778-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Dec. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Cobo v. Titlemax of Nev.

Case Details

Full title:ALISIA COBO, Plaintiff, TITLEMAX OF NEVADA, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 19, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01778-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Dec. 19, 2022)