From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coble v. Butler

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Oct 7, 2009
No. CV-09-8021-PCT-LOA (D. Ariz. Oct. 7, 2009)

Opinion

No. CV-09-8021-PCT-LOA.

October 7, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Join Additional Parties, docket # 38, seeking to join Michael Ray Fuquas' "case to this one due to similarity in the nature of both cases." (docket # 38) It is unclear whether Plaintiff seeks to join Michael Ray Fuquas as a Plaintiff in this matter, or whether he seeks to consolidate this matter with a separate action brought by Michael Ray Fuquas. Upon review of CM/ECF, however, the Court did not find any cases brought by this individual. Thus, it appears that Plaintiff simply seeks to join Michael Ray Fuquas as a party.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 governs joinder of parties and sets forth the circumstances under which a party must be joined. Fed.R.Civ.P. 19(a). Plaintiff's motion consists of a single sentence requesting joinder "due to similarity in the nature of both cases." (docket # 38) Similarity between cases is not a sufficient basis for joinder under Rule 19(a). Plaintiff does not provide any other arguments in support of joinder, and has not satisfied the requirements of Rule 19(a).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Join Additional Parties (docket # 38) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Coble v. Butler

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Oct 7, 2009
No. CV-09-8021-PCT-LOA (D. Ariz. Oct. 7, 2009)
Case details for

Coble v. Butler

Case Details

Full title:Philip Coble, Plaintiff, v. Gary H. Butler, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Oct 7, 2009

Citations

No. CV-09-8021-PCT-LOA (D. Ariz. Oct. 7, 2009)