From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cobell v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the federal Circuit
Apr 6, 2012
2012-3080 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2012)

Opinion

2012-3080

04-06-2012

CHRISTINE COBELL, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.


Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DE0752090455-I-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Department of Health and Human Services moves without opposition to recaption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board as respondent, and for a 40-day extension of time to file a response brief.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Cobell's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motions are granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. The Board should calculate its brief due date from the date of service of the petitioner's initial brief.

FOR THE COURT

______________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
cc: Brenda Lindlief-Hall, Esq.

Alex P. Hontos, Esq.

Lindsey Schreckengost, Esq.
s21


Summaries of

Cobell v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the federal Circuit
Apr 6, 2012
2012-3080 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Cobell v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINE COBELL, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 6, 2012

Citations

2012-3080 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2012)