From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cobe v. Union Nat. Bank of Bartlesville

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 26, 1915
146 P. 19 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 4142

Opinion Filed January 26, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Brief. Where the plaintiff in error files no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Syllabus by Galbraith, C.)

Error from District Court, Washington County; R. H. Hudson, Judge.

Action by the Union National Bank of Bartlesville, Okla., and another, against the Commerce Trust Company of Kansas City, Mo., and others. From an order appointing a receiver to take charge of certain stock and properties of the Renfrow Oil Gas Company, Ira M. Cobe and the Renfrow Oil Gas Company appeal. Dismissed.

George Campbell and Ames, Chambers, Lowe Richardson, for plaintiffs in error.

Ledbetter, Stuart Bell, Burwell, Crockett Johnson, John H. Brennan, Shea Blue, L. A. Rowland, and J. P. O'Meard, for defendants in error.


The petition in error and case-made in this cause were filed with the clerk of this court on June 28, 1912, and it was regularly submitted on the 18th day of January, 1915. No brief has been filed by the plaintiff in error, as required by rule 7 (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix) of this court.

We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Cobe v. Union Nat. Bank of Bartlesville

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jan 26, 1915
146 P. 19 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Cobe v. Union Nat. Bank of Bartlesville

Case Details

Full title:COBE et. al. v. UNION NAT. BANK OF BARTLESVILLE et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 26, 1915

Citations

146 P. 19 (Okla. 1915)
146 P. 19

Citing Cases

Kapp v. Croan

Opinion Filed February 1, 1916.APPEAL AND ERROR — Failure to File Brief — Dismissal. Same as Cobe v. Bank, 44…