From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cobbler Nev., LLC v. Moss

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 19, 2017
Case No. 3:15-1915-SB (D. Or. Jan. 19, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 3:15-1915-SB

01-19-2017

COBBLER NEVADA, LLC and CLEAR SKIES NEVADA, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. SHAWNA MOSS, Defendant.


ORDER

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

United States Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman issued Findings and Recommendation in this case on December 19, 2016. ECF 45. Judge Beckerman recommended that Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment be granted and a default judgment be entered in the amount of statutory damages of $750 for each Plaintiff. No party has filed objections.

Under the Federal Magistrates Act ("Act"), the court may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If a party files objections to a magistrate's findings and recommendations, "the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." Id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

If no party objects, the Act does not prescribe any standard of review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985) ("There is no indication that Congress, in enacting [the Act], intended to require a district judge to review a magistrate's report to which no objections are filed."); United States. v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (holding that the court must review de novo magistrate's findings and recommendations if objection is made, "but not otherwise").

Although review is not required in the absence of objections, the Act "does not preclude further review by the district judge[] sua sponte . . . under a de novo or any other standard." Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. Indeed, the Advisory Committee Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) recommend that "[w]hen no timely objection is filed," the court review the magistrate's findings and recommendations for "clear error on the face of the record."

No party having made objections, this Court follows the recommendation of the Advisory Committee and reviews Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. No such error is apparent. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Beckerman's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 45. Plaintiffs' motion for default judgment (ECF 41) is GRANTED. A judgment will be entered against Defendant, permanently enjoining her from infringing Plaintiffs' rights in the movies The Cobbler and Good Kill and awarding $750 in statutory damages to each Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 19th day of January, 2017.

/s/ Michael H. Simon

Michael H. Simon

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cobbler Nev., LLC v. Moss

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 19, 2017
Case No. 3:15-1915-SB (D. Or. Jan. 19, 2017)
Case details for

Cobbler Nev., LLC v. Moss

Case Details

Full title:COBBLER NEVADA, LLC and CLEAR SKIES NEVADA, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. SHAWNA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jan 19, 2017

Citations

Case No. 3:15-1915-SB (D. Or. Jan. 19, 2017)