From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cobb v. William Parks

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 29, 2020
SC: 160211 (Mich. Apr. 29, 2020)

Opinion

SC: 160211

04-29-2020

JESSIE LEE COBB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILLIAM PARKS and PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.


Order

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices COA: 342774
Wayne CC: 17-001388-NI

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 30, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

BERNSTEIN, J., did not participate because he has a family member with an interest that could be affected by the proceeding.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 29, 2020

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Cobb v. William Parks

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 29, 2020
SC: 160211 (Mich. Apr. 29, 2020)
Case details for

Cobb v. William Parks

Case Details

Full title:JESSIE LEE COBB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILLIAM PARKS and PROGRESSIVE…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Apr 29, 2020

Citations

SC: 160211 (Mich. Apr. 29, 2020)