Opinion
No. C 10-03907 MEJ
10-12-2011
JONATHAN D. COBB, SR., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ERNEST BREDE, et al., Defendants.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE
PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs' "Objection to Denied Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge." Dkt. No. 100. In their objection, Plaintiffs appear to request that a district judge review the orders of the assigned magistrate judge in this case. However, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the magistrate judges of this district court are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate judge may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court. Thus, as all parties have consented to the undersigned's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the undersigned presides over this case with the same authority as a district judge. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' request is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
JONATHAN D COBB SR Plaintiff,
v.
ERNEST BREDE Defendant.
Case Number: 10-03907 MEJ
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on October 12, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Jonathan D. Cobb, Sr.
828 Weeks St.
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Walter Arlen St. Clair
1227 Sevier St Menlo Park, CA 94025
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk