From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cobarruviaz v. Maplebear, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 14, 2015
No. C15-0697 EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2015)

Opinion

No. C15-0697 EMC

08-14-2015

DOMINIC COBARRUVIAZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MAPLEBEAR, INC., et al., Defendants.


SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant Maplebear, Inc.'s motion to compel arbitration. Docket No. 29. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file supplemental briefs, not to exceed five (5) pages in length, addressing the following question and providing relevant legal citations: Was the parties' selection of JAMS as the arbitral forum in Section 7 of the Agreement "an integral part of the agreement to arbitrate, rather than an 'ancillary logistical concern?'" Reddam v. KPMG LLP, 457 F.3d 1054, 1060 (9th Cir. 2006), abrogated in part on other grounds by Atlantic Nat. Trust LLC v. Mat. Hawley Ins. Co, 621 F.3d 931, 940 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Brown v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp., 211 F.3d 1217, 1222 (11th Cir. 2000). The briefs shall be filed no later than 10 a.m. PDT on Tuesday, August 18, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 14, 2015

/s/_________

EDWARD M. CHEN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Cobarruviaz v. Maplebear, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 14, 2015
No. C15-0697 EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Cobarruviaz v. Maplebear, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DOMINIC COBARRUVIAZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MAPLEBEAR, INC., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 14, 2015

Citations

No. C15-0697 EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2015)