From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coats v. McGuiness

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 6, 2008
No. CIV S-08-0476-JAM-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-0476-JAM-GGH P.

October 6, 2008


ORDER


On August 26, 2008, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed August 11, 2008, denying the motion to appoint counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed August 11, 2008 (Docket #40), is affirmed.


Summaries of

Coats v. McGuiness

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 6, 2008
No. CIV S-08-0476-JAM-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2008)
Case details for

Coats v. McGuiness

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM THOMAS COATS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN McGUINESS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 6, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-0476-JAM-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2008)