Coastal Fed. Credit Union v. Griffin

Full title: Coastal Federal Credit Union, Respondent, v. Clarence LeAnders Griffin…

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 17, 2014

Appellate Case No. 2012-211872 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-211872 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-469

12-17-2014

Coastal Federal Credit Union, Respondent, v. Clarence LeAnders Griffin, Jr., Appellant.

Clarence LeAnders Griffin, Jr., of Columbia, pro se. David P. Nanney, Jr., Charles Nathaniel Griffin, III, and Sarah Dalonzo-Baker, all of Kirschbaum Nanney Keenan & Griffin, PA, of Raleigh, NC, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Richland County L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Clarence LeAnders Griffin, Jr., of Columbia, pro se. David P. Nanney, Jr., Charles Nathaniel Griffin, III, and Sarah Dalonzo-Baker, all of Kirschbaum Nanney Keenan & Griffin, PA, of Raleigh, NC, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. M & T Enters. of Mt. Pleasant, 379 S.C. 645, 658, 667 S.E.2d 7, 14 (Ct. App. 2008) ("It is well settled that an issue must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate review."); Bean v. S.C. Cent. R.R. Co., 392 S.C. 532, 560, 709 S.E.2d 99, 113-14 (Ct. App. 2011) (finding an issue unpreserved for appellate review when the trial court failed to address the issue in its order granting summary judgment and the appellant did not file a motion under Rule 59(e), SCRCP). AFFIRMED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.