From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coakley v. Coakley

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
May 8, 2014
NO. 03-13-00142-CV (Tex. App. May. 8, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 03-13-00142-CV

05-08-2014

Richard Coakley, Appellant v. Mari Coakley, Appellee


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-09-005199, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Richard Coakley filed his notice of appeal on February 27, 2013. Appellant requested and received four extensions of time to file his brief. On April 7, 2014, we ordered appellant to file his brief by April 17, 2014, and informed him that this appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution if he did not file the brief by that date. Appellant has failed to file his brief. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

__________

Jeff Rose, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose Dismissed for Want of Prosecution


Summaries of

Coakley v. Coakley

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
May 8, 2014
NO. 03-13-00142-CV (Tex. App. May. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Coakley v. Coakley

Case Details

Full title:Richard Coakley, Appellant v. Mari Coakley, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: May 8, 2014

Citations

NO. 03-13-00142-CV (Tex. App. May. 8, 2014)