From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coakley v. 42ND Pct. Case 458

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 27, 2009
08 Civ. 6206 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 27, 2009)

Opinion

08 Civ. 6206 (JSR).

September 27, 2009


ORDER


On August 21, 2009, the Honorable Ronald L. Ellis, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned matter recommending that the Court grant defendants' motion to dismiss all claims against them pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

Plaintiff has failed to file any objection to the Report and Recommendation, and, for that reason alone, has waived any right to review by this Court. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147-48 (1985); Mario v. P C Food Markets, Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002); Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation, and, for the reasons therein, grants defendants' motion in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close entry number 16 on the docket for this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Coakley v. 42ND Pct. Case 458

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 27, 2009
08 Civ. 6206 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 27, 2009)
Case details for

Coakley v. 42ND Pct. Case 458

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN COAKLEY, Plaintiff, v. 42ND PCT. CASE 458, ET AL., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 27, 2009

Citations

08 Civ. 6206 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 27, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wilks v. Wells Fargo Bank

Plaintiffs' claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 necessarily fail because they have not alleged the “specific…

Longo v. Ortiz

Even if the Court were to consider these allegations and documents, the Court is skeptical that, without…