From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Coachlight Las Cruces, Ltd. v. Mountain Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Jun 2, 1983
99 N.M. 787 (N.M. 1983)

Opinion

No. 14901.

June 2, 1983.

APPEAL FROM DISTRICT COURT, DONA ANA COUNTY, JAMES T. MARTIN, D.J.

Pickett, Bates Holmes, Lloyd O. Bates, Jr., Las Cruces, for plaintiff-petitioner.

Sutin, Thayer Browne, H. Perry Ryon, Albuquerque, for defendant-respondent.


OPINION


We granted certiorari to review the opinion of the Court of Appeals in this case. Respondent moved to quash the writ because this Court lacks jurisdiction; the petition for certiorari having been filed twenty-two days after the Court of Appeals denied a motion for rehearing.

NMSA 1978, Civ.App.R. 28(b) (Cum. Supp. 1982) (emphasis added), states in pertinent part:

(b) Time. Petition for writ of certiorari shall be filed . . . within twenty days after final action by the court of appeals . . . .

We have held that a petition for writ of certiorari must be filed within twenty days of the date of final action by the Court of Appeals. Gulf Oil Corporation v. RotaCone Field Operating Co., 85 N.M. 636, 515 P.2d 640 (1973). Therefore, after reviewing the record, we hold that this petition for certiorari is quashed for lack of jurisdiction and we do not reach the merits of the petition.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to publish this opinion along with the opinion of the Court of Appeals.


Summaries of

Coachlight Las Cruces, Ltd. v. Mountain Bell Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of New Mexico
Jun 2, 1983
99 N.M. 787 (N.M. 1983)
Case details for

Coachlight Las Cruces, Ltd. v. Mountain Bell Telephone Co.

Case Details

Full title:COACHLIGHT LAS CRUCES, LTD., Plaintiff-Petitioner v. MOUNTAIN BELL…

Court:Supreme Court of New Mexico

Date published: Jun 2, 1983

Citations

99 N.M. 787 (N.M. 1983)
664 P.2d 985

Citing Cases

Matter of Mountain Bell

Although statutory authority specifically is granted to the Commission to regulate a public…

Howard v. Ulibarri

The New Mexico Supreme Court has interpreted this time requirement as jurisdictional. See Coachlight Las…